Comments on: LA Times adds AI-generated counterpoints to opinion pieces

By: rigoberto.kautzer

rigoberto.kautzer — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 06:16:21 +0000

In reply to rolf.brekke. I get what you're saying! More content is always great, but I just hope they don't sacrifice quality for quantity. AI can be helpful, but it’s no substitute for real journalists who know how to tell a story.

By: Oolong

Oolong — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 04:06:21 +0000

What’s next? AI writing our grocery lists? Just hire actual reporters instead of depending on technology to do the thinking for us.

By: buddy.romaguera1965

buddy.romaguera1965 — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 02:19:21 +0000

Really? An AI-generated argument? Might as well just throw my money out the window. I can get that junk online for free.

By: Eros

Eros — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:44:21 +0000

In reply to glenn.lang. I totally agree with you! AI just can't replicate the passion and intuition of a human journalist. It's like expecting a microwave to cook a gourmet meal—no way! We need the real deal, not just algorithms spitting out words.

By: lue.beahan52

lue.beahan52 — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:38:21 +0000

This is exactly why newspapers are dying. In today’s fast-paced digital world, people are increasingly seeking out authentic voices that resonate with their experiences and emotions. They desire genuine insights and perspectives that reflect the complexity of contemporary life, rather than content produced by algorithms that often result in bland, generic commentary. The art of storytelling and the unique viewpoints provided by real journalists and opinion-makers are what truly engage readers and foster a connection to the news, making it essential for media outlets to return to these roots in order to thrive in an ever-evolving landscape.

By: josef.dietrich

josef.dietrich — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:35:21 +0000

The whole industry is going crazy… First, we have Bezos, now Soon-Shiong… What a world!… Journalism is dying a slow death…

By: rolf.brekke

rolf.brekke — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 01:30:21 +0000

Hey, if it keeps the Times afloat and gives us more content, I’m on board! Just don’t get rid of your good writers.

By: cristina.wehner20

cristina.wehner20 — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:49:21 +0000

In reply to macie.brekke1998. I see your point! Having AI-generated viewpoints could educate folks and broaden their horizons. Plus, it might save costs, which is super important with all the layoffs happening. But I wonder how reliable the AI perspectives will be.

By: Eros

Eros — Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:02:21 +0000

Oh sure, because who needs AI perspectives, right? Let’s just stick to the oh-so-genuine REAL opinions, as if those aren’t shaped by a whole host of biases! What a fantastic idea! It’s not like we’re sliding down a slippery slope or anything…

By: macie.brekke1998

macie.brekke1998 — Mon, 03 Mar 2025 23:14:21 +0000

I think its actually a pretty good idea Some people need a bit of help understanding different viewpoints Plus might help with the papers financial issues