Friday, December 5, 2025
MagnifyPost.com
  • Home
  • General News
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Science & Technology
  • Sport
  • Economy
No Result
View All Result
MagnifyPost.com
Home Politics

US Supreme Court looks set to shoot down Mexico suit against gunmakers

by Thomas B.
9 months ago
in Politics
Reading Time: 8 mins read
A A
2
493
SHARES
966
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on Linkedin

The United States Supreme Court is to weigh in on Mexico's lawsuit against US gunmakers / ©AFP

(AFP) – The US Supreme Court appeared poised on Tuesday to toss out a $10 billion lawsuit filed by Mexico accusing American gun manufacturers of fueling drug trafficking and violence. Smith & Wesson and US gun distributor Interstate Arms are seeking dismissal of the Mexican government’s suit, which has been winding its way through US courts since 2021.

Mexico, which is under mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump to curb drug trafficking, accuses the firearms makers of “aiding and abetting” illegal gun sales because they allegedly know that some of their products are being unlawfully sold to the drug cartels. A federal judge tossed out the case in 2022, saying Mexico’s claims failed to overcome the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which was passed by Congress in 2005 and shields US gunmakers from liability for criminals misusing their products.

An appeals court revived the case, citing an exception to the law, and Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms sought relief from the Supreme Court. A majority of the justices on the conservative-dominated top US court appeared to side with the firearms companies during more than 90 minutes of oral arguments. Noel Francisco, representing Smith & Wesson and Interstate Arms, said gun companies cannot be held accountable for the misuse of their products.

“If Mexico is right, then every law enforcement organization in America has missed the largest criminal conspiracy in history,” Francisco said. “And Budweiser is liable for every accident caused by underage drinkers since it knows that teenagers will buy beer, drive drunk and crash.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, questioned what consequences an expanded theory of aiding and abetting liability would have for the American economy. “That’s a real concern,” Kavanaugh said. “Lots of sellers and manufacturers of ordinary products know that they’re going to be misused by some subset of people.”

Justice Samuel Alito, also a conservative, raised what he said was a “question that may be on the minds of ordinary Americans.” “Mexico says that US gun manufacturers are contributing to illegal conduct in Mexico,” Alito said. “There are Americans who think that Mexican government officials are contributing to a lot of illegal conduct here.”

Catherine Stetson, representing the Mexican government, was careful to steer the arguments away from any discussion of the US Constitution’s Second Amendment, which protects the rights of Americans to bear arms. “Mexico is not trying to legislate gun use in the United States,” Stetson said. She stated that up to 600,000 US guns are illegally trafficked into Mexico every year and that “manufacturers know that they are selling a dangerous product to specific rogue dealers who are selling to straw purchasers for the cartels.”

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative, and Justice Elena Kagan, a liberal, expressed concern, however, that the suit does not identify particular retailers accused of selling guns illegally to the cartels. “You haven’t sued any of the retailers that were the most proximate cause of the harm,” Barrett said. Making her case, Stetson noted that some companies are even “designing certain guns to target the Mexican market,” giving them Spanish names such as “El Jefe.”

Francisco pushed back, saying, “The notion that selling a Spanish-named firearm is what gives rise to joint purpose with cartels under the aiding and abetting statute is as wrong as it is offensive.” Mexico maintains that 70-90 percent of the weapons recovered at crime scenes have been trafficked from the United States. Mexico tightly controls firearms sales, making them practically impossible to obtain legally.

Even so, drug-related violence has seen around 480,000 people killed in Mexico since the government deployed the army to combat trafficking in 2006, according to official figures. The case comes against a backdrop of US-Mexico trade tensions. Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on imports from Mexico on Tuesday, citing a lack of progress in stemming the flow of drugs such as fentanyl into the United States. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum vowed to hit back with retaliatory duties.

– Chris Lefkow

© 2024 AFP

Tags: Drug TraffickingGun ControlSupreme Court
Share197Tweet123Share35Send
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Follow us

Recent News

Netflix to buy Warner Bros. Discovery in deal of the decade

December 5, 2025

Netflix to buy Warner Bros. Discovery for nearly $83 billion

December 5, 2025

EU hits Musk’s X with 120-mn-euro fine, risking Trump ire

December 5, 2025
MagnifyPost.com

We bring you the top international news & headlines from around the world with live updates on breaking global events.

News

  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • General News
  • Politics
  • Science & Technology

Pages

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Network

  • Coolinarco.com
  • CasualSelf.com
  • Fit.CasualSelf.com
  • Sport.CasualSelf.com
  • MachinaSphere.com
  • SportBeep.com
  • EconomyLens.com
  • TodayAiNews.com
  • VideosArena.com

© 2024 Top World News ~ MagnifyPost.com

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Politics
  • General News
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Science & Technology

© 2023 - Premium news by MagnifyPost.

Coolinarco.com CasualSelf.com

wpDiscuz